Tag Archives: Anwar Al-Awlaki

Obama’s Secret Kill List.

Secret ‘Kill List’ Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all&r1

“A few sharp-eyed observers inside and outside the government understood what the public did not. Without showing his hand, Mr. Obama had preserved three major policies — rendition, military commissions and indefinite detention — that have been targets of human rights groups since the 2001 terrorist attacks.”

“It is also because Mr. Obama embraced a disputed method for counting civilian casualties that did little to box him in. It in effect counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent”

It is the strangest of bureaucratic rituals: Every week or so, more than 100 members of the government’s sprawling national security apparatus gather, by secure video teleconference, to pore over terrorist suspects’ biographies and recommend to the president who should be the next to die.

This secret “nominations” process is an invention of the Obama administration, a grim debating society that vets the PowerPoint slides bearing the names, aliases and life stories of suspected members of Al Qaeda’s branch in Yemen or its allies in Somalia’s Shabab militia.”

“Yet the administration’s very success at killing terrorism suspects has been shadowed by a suspicion: that Mr. Obama has avoided the complications of detention by deciding, in effect, to take no prisoners alive. While scores of suspects have been killed under Mr. Obama, only one has been taken into American custody, and the president has balked at adding new prisoners to Guantánamo.”

“That record, and Mr. Awlaki’s calls for more attacks, presented Mr. Obama with an urgent question: Could he order the targeted killing of an American citizen, in a country with which the United States was not at war, in secret and without the benefit of a trial?

The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel prepared a lengthy memo justifying that extraordinary step, asserting that while the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process applied, it could be satisfied by internal deliberations in the executive branch.

 

Someone once told me that the job of liberalism is to hold a mirror up to society and government and say “You can do better than this.” We have to do better. Obama was the guy who was supposed to stop all this, not expand it, not create a secret list of assassination targets. There has been zero transparency on this issue, and zero legal recourse. The entire operation is a closed, black box, and that black box is killing people all over the world. I don’t think it is too strong to say that I feel a profound moral imperative to alert people to the fact that this is happening.


Obama kills citizens, refuses to discuss legal justification

Good times in the news this week. I know I’m stepping away from the usual “poetry only” nature of this blog, but I feel that circumstances are forcing my hand.

Glen Greenwald (not going to lie, one of my personal heroes) reported today that the Obama administration has absolutely refused to reveal any information about the legal and factual basis for the killings of Anwar Al-Awlaki, his 16 year old son, or Samir Khan. The ACLU actually is suing them for this, and sadly, they will most likely come up empty handed.

It’s one (patently reprehensible) thing to kill American citizens without any kind of legal review, trial, or conviction. But it’s even more astounding when you refuse to reveal ANY of the evidence after the fact. You can brag about the killing on national TV, as Obama did on the Tonight Show, to appear “tough on terror” or whatever, but when it comes to actually presenting your evidence in a court of law, you hide behind the state secrets defense.

Behavior of this sort is callow, spineless, and sadly, evident during both the Bush and Obama administrations.

If there is one positive thing to be said, it’s that the ACLU appears to be absolutely non-partisan in defense of basic human rights. Kudos to them.